Tools & Techniques
Test or Transfer
Tools & Techniques
WikiTree: Find any person of surname x where someone within 8 degrees of separation has indicated they have taken an atDNA test (substitute your SURNAME of choice – caps not necessary):
A network technique documented by Shelly Crawford to show which of your matches connect to whom amongst your up to fourth cousin matches.
This technique utilizes the DNAGedCom client (small sub required) downloads of your ancestry match list and ICW files, and the basic template from NodeXL (needs Excel 2007+and Windows)
Really helps target the messages to potential matches by showing their connections, and great for navigating between the connected ones.
My post about this – which has already found me a tested “cousin” on a branch of the tree I’ve long been trying to prove the fate of, and given me what seems to be a higher response rate to Ancestry messages.
Shelly’s more recent post about her successes with clustering – triangulation is the icing not the cake
The stats from Blaine Bettinger’s survey of actual shared DNA between known cousins
The interactive filter of the above for the amount shared you enter:
Behold Genealogy: Double Match Triangulator
I particularly like his clear definition/distinction between
- Double match
- Full triangulation
See also TheLegalGenealogist’s blogpost about this new tool (Nov 2016).
- Free tools
Try the One to Many report for selected people and use the 3D chromosome browser option to see who all matches whom all else of your selection on which segment
- Tier one tools (subscription)
Use DNAGedcom’s instructions for the GEDMatch Matching Segment Search/Triangulation downloads to import the data for a kit from GEDmatch into DNAGedcom for use in the latter’s Autosomal DNA Segment Analyzer.
Try the new (Nov 2016) Triangulation Groups which Jim Bartlett explained on the Rootsweb DNA list as:
Think the way it works is like Tree branches: You are the trunk – everyone listed is a Match with you. Then some closer relatives are listed taking off from the trunk; then some smaller branches – taking off from the closer relatives (not the trunk) which form Triangulated Groups. Jim – www.segmentology.org
a hint: to mark who owns each crossover instead of the technique shown I used the owner’s letter in a simple right justified cell which positioned the owner right next to the line.
- and if you get lost, there’s a Facebook group; https://www.facebook.com/groups/visualphasing/
Tests or transfers:
It is recommended that you “fish in many ponds” to milk your DNA tests for as much as you can wring out of them.
Two of the DNA testing companies (MyHeritage and FTNDA), and GEDMatch of course, currently (Feb 2018) accept transfers of your raw DNA file – apart from the newest 23andme kits.
But (there’s always a but!) that does mean that you are not necessarily comparing like to like and have to bear in mind the differences when evaluating where it is best for you to re-test at another company and when to transfer.
- Roberta Estes blog on what can be transferred to where
and her blog on where to test for what
as well as her further detail on why more recent (after May 2016) Ancestry testers, if genie addicts, are better off testing at both, rather than just Ancestry and transferring in to FTDNA
- Loise Coakley’s FTDNA’s Ancestry transfer vs a new test
My current conclusion is that if you have tested on Ancestry after they changed to their current chip (mid May 2016), it is better to re-test at FamilyTreeDNA (their FamilyFinder test) than to transfer your Ancestry file to there but different populations will get different mileage on that.
Those having problems converting a newer Ancestry file into FTDNA should explore this tool:
MyHeritage has massively improved their algorithms (Jan 2018 – http://dnasurnames.blogspot.co.nz/2018/01/kudos-to-myheritage.html) and are a rapidly growing player in the market.
As at now (Oct 2017) 23andme kits from ?May 2017? are not compatible with the current GEDMatch but can be uploaded to Genesis Beta – with the added advantage there that there they are compatible with LivingDNA tests uploaded to the Beta as well.
- Roberta Estes posts on ethnicity results
- Judy Russell (The Legal Genealogist) on, yes, ethnicity results
- Debbie Kennett’s comparisons and comments on admixture results
- my own LivingDna results
Working your DNA
From The DNA Geek: http://thednageek.com/science-the-heck-out-of-your-dna-part-1/